Love v. State

OPINION

KIRSCH, Chief Judge.

Jacob Seott Love brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of his home. Love contends that the evidence is inadmissible because it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. On appeal, we address the following restated issues:

L. Whether an anonymous tip that Love committed a specific robbery coupled with an eyewitness report…