Richardson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellants-Defendants Phillip W. and Anita B. Richardson (collectively, the “Richardsons”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence obtained from the warrantless search of them trash. We affirm.1
*1099Issues
The Richardsons raise two issues on interlocutory appeal, which we restate as whether the trial court erred by denying their motions to suppress evidence under the Indiana Constitution because:
I. An anonymous tip that the Rich-ardsons manufactured methamphetamine did not give police reasonable, articulable suspicion to search their…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- T.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Belvedere v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Breaston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wilkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lacey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.