Legal Opinion
General Electric Company v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 25, 1968No. 21465PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff in the District Court, sought review of the action of the Commissioner of Patents in refusing to enter an amendment to an application for a patent in the name of Henry L. Herold, et al., the entire right, title and interest of which was assigned to the appellant. This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, granting the appellee’s cross-motion for summary judgment and from an order of that court denying appellant’s motion to alter or amend judgment.
In 1960, nineteen applications for United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eyre v. PotterSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Advanced Display Systems, Inc. v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Quaker City Gear Works, Inc. And Karlheinz Roth, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Skil Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re HawkinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.