Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Perotta

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 30, 2010No. 7:09-cv-02458PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

Plaintiff Earl Hayes (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, brings this suit against five officers of the City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, as well as the City of Poughkeepsie and the City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, (collectively, “Defendants”). While the Complaint does not state a specific cause of action, the Court construes it as alleging a violation of Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Defendants move to dismiss this suit. (Dkt. No. 19.) For the forgoing reasons, that motion is granted in part and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Guardino v. Village of Scarsdale Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Hudson v. County of DutchessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Gannon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. In re FisherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. DeSean J. Owens v. Imam Kedar Abdul Malik and Orange CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API