Guardino v. Village of Scarsdale Police Department
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
McMAHON, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Lawrence Guardino (“Plaintiff” or “Guardino”) brings this action pro se under the Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., against his former employer, defendant Village of Scarsdale Police Department (“Defendant” or “SPD”). Guardino alleges that SPD unlawfully discriminated against him in violation of the ADA when SPD terminated Guardino for failing to be present at his post. SPD moves to dismiss Guardino’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Higgins v. NYP Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Carris v. First Student, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Novick v. Vill. of Wappingers FallsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Garcia v. Yonkers Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Daniel v. T & M Protection Resources LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.