Legal Opinion
Meyerstein v. Burke
California Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1924No. S. F. No. 10270PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Further consideration of the record and the points made in this case satisfies us that the decision in the first instance of the district court of appeal as rendered by Mr. Justice Sturtevant is correct and we hereby adopt his opinion as follows:
“The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to obtain a judgment reforming a contract alleged to have been executed through the mistake of the parties. A trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and there after a judgment was entered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed, bringing up a bill of exceptions.
“…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- La Mancha Development Corp. v. SheegogCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Bradford v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Security First National Trust & Savings Bank v. LoftusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.