Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1919No. Civ. No. 3169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. Affirmed; The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to quiet its title and right of possession to a tract of submerged land at San Pedro of which the defendant was in possession and was thereon maintaining a wharf under a franchise granted to it under the provisions of the Political Code.

The ease was submitted to the trial court upon a stipulation as to its facts, from which stipulation it appeared that the title which the city of Los Angeles had in and to said tract of submerged land was such as was conveyed to it by an act of the legislature approved May 1, 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 1256), and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Santa Cruz v. Southern Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cimpher v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Atwood v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Los Angeles v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lloyd v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API