Legal Opinion · Dissent

Viviani v. Borough of Bogota

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 25, 2002Published

1DissentZazzali, J.

I join in Justice Verniero’s dissent. I write separately to address the following concerns: there is little if any difference between abolishing a position and terminating services; even if there is a distinction, the Court today establishes an almost insurmountable obstacle for firefighters; and the legislative intent favors plaintiff.

The Borough of Bogota (Borough) distinguishes between termination of a firefighter when the governing body is “abolishing the position,” which the Borough claims is permissible, and the discharge of a firefighter for the purpose of “terminating] his services,”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Lullo v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 1066Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Galloway Township Board of Education v. Galloway Township Ass'n of Educational SecretariesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API