Legal Opinion

Laing v. LIBERTY LOAN CO. OF SMITHFIELD, ETC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1980No. 795DC743PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The issue raised by this case is whether the trial court acted properly in striking defendant’s answer and entering judgment by default. We hold the trial court properly applied the discretionary powers of sanction for discovery abuse provided in Rule 37 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff has alleged performance of a contract to provide legal service, and defendant has never really denied this contract and its performance. To prove his damages, plaintiff would have to show money was collected on the thirty-seven judgments he obtained. Business records and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Norman v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Routh v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Atlantic Veneer Corp. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Triad MacK Sales and Service, Inc. v. Clement Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API