American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The assignments of error brought forward and argued in plaintiffs’ brief are all based on a single exception to the Order entered 15 September 1977 finding plaintiffs in contempt and imposing sanctions. Such a broadside exception does not present for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact but presents only the question whether the facts found or admitted support the conclusions of law and the judgment. MacKay v. McIntosh, 270 N.C. 69, 153 S.E. 2d 800 (1967); Johnson v. Johnson, 17 N.C. App. 398, 194 S.E. 2d 562 (1973); 1 Strong’s N.C. Index,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- MacKay v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bumgarner v. ReneauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Velez v. Dick Keffer Pontiac GMC Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Laing v. LIBERTY LOAN CO. OF SMITHFIELD, ETC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Feeassco, LLC v. Steel Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.