Legal Opinion

Routh v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 8318DC502PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

At the outset we note that defendant filed a counterclaim that has not been disposed of in the trial court. This appeal is thus premature and subject to dismissal because it is from an order which adjudicates fewer than all of the claims of the parties. North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 54(b). We note as well that an order imposing sanctions is ordinarily interlocutory. Nevertheless, we choose to exercise our discretion and pass on the merits of defendant’s appeal from the default judgment imposed as a sanction for defendant’s failure to comply with the order for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Stroupe v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Laing v. LIBERTY LOAN CO. OF SMITHFIELD, ETC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Ralls v. WyandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Silverthorne v. Coastal Land Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Roane-Barker v. Southeastern Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BourlonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Clark v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Matthews v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Pugh v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API