Legal Opinion

Keith v. S. S. Goldstone

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1978No. Civ. 51089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUPP, J. * —

In this action for damages for personal injuries brought under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act as amended in 1972 (hereafter LHWCA), 33 United States Code section 901 et seq., judgment was rendered for defendants following a jury verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the trial court committed prejudicial error in the giving of certain instructions and in the failure to give other instructions. We affirm the judgment.

Appellant (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) claimed to have been injured on January 16, 1974, while working as a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Antonio Napoli v. (Transpacific Carriers Corp. And Universal Cargo Carriers, Inc.) Hellenic Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Anthony Munoz v. Flota Merchante Grancolombiana, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. IT Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Prohoroff v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Stance v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Murphy v. National Shipping Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1978
  5. Whitehill v. United States Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API