Legal Opinion

Stance v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1984No. A016023PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Iveal Stance appeals from a judgment of dismissal following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Matson Navigation Company (Matson), He contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that section 905(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq.; “LHWCA” or “Act”) precludes him from recovering under California Vehicle Code section 17154 for injuries he sustained in a collision with a car driven by a fellow longshoreman which was under contract to Matson…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. C. L. Smith Co. v. Roger Ducharme, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. Santa Monica Young Men's Christian Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Seide v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Stevedoring Services of America v. Prudential Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Dugas v. C. Brewer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API