Legal Opinion
Gene Hirs, Hydromation Engineering Company, a Michigan Corporation, and Moore Filtration Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Detroit Filter Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1970No. 19466_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.
This is the third suit between these parties. Appellants are the owner and licensees of United States Letters Patent Nos. 2,867,325 and 2,867,326, covering generally an industrial filter designed to filter dirty liquids. In the first action between these parties the District Court found that a filter manufactured and sold by appellee infringed the above patents. Pursuant to that finding, the District Court, on November 22, 1965, enjoined the appellee from:
“[Manufacturing, using and/or selling filter apparatus embodying the invention described in claim 11 of United…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Field Body Corp. v. Highland Body Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Hadco Products, Inc. v. Frank Dini Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Textag Co., Inc. v. HayslipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Locklin v. Switzer BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Carman Industries, Inc. v. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. v. Lectra Systems, Inc. And Lectra Systems, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- The Schlegel Manufacturing Company v. Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.