Legal Opinion

Frank v. LoVetere

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2005No. CIV. 3:03CV1014JBAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DOCS. ##40, 41, 42, 49, 68]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

On November 7, 2003, H. Jonathan Frank and the Frank Family 1996 Trust filed an amended complaint [doc. #38] against Reflexite Corporation and individual defendants Arthur LoVetere, Cecil Ur-sprung, Louis Baccei, Worth Loomis, Theodore Patlovich, Stephen Raffay, William Rowland, and Peter Eio, alleging that: the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty to Reflexite Corpora tion (Count One); the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the plaintiff (Count Two); defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MBIA Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Beckworth ex rel. Discount Trophy & Co. v. BizierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  4. Burgess Ex Rel. BancorpSouth, Inc. v. PattersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API