Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Northern Assur. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 2, 1937No. 467PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the defendant insurance company from a judgment against it in an action upon its “inland transit floater policy” issued to the plaintiff, covering losses on merchandise “shipped by or to the assured * * * or in which they may have an interest.” The claimed loss relates to several hundred tons of crude rubber in bales destroyed or damaged by fire on May 3, 1934, while the rubber was on Pier 38, Brooklyn, N. Y. With respect to crude rubber the policy contained a specific provision, reading as follows: “It being specially understood with respect to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. F. S. Buffum Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pond Creek Mill & Elevator Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Berkshire Cotton Manufacturing Co. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sadler MacHinery Co. v. Ohio Nat., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Banking & Trading Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. KirkevoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Johnson v. BantaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.