Legal Opinion
Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. F. S. Buffum Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pound, J,
Plaintiff, appellant, hereinafter referred to as the seller, is a California corporation doing business in San Francisco. Defendant, respondent, hereinafter referred to as the buyer, is a New York corporation doing business in the city of New York. The action is for the purchase price of two carloads of dried prunes according to the terms of written contracts executed in May and June, 1920. The contracts are of a standard form known as “ California Dried Fruit Contract (Rail Shipment) adopted by National Wholesale Grocers’ Association of the United States and Dried Fruit Association…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Waddle v. . CabanaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Loomis v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- The Turner-Looker Company v. . AprileNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Goodman v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Frank Pure Food Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Jones & Brindisi, Inc. v. BreslawNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Freier v. ShayaniCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.