Legal Opinion

Pan American Trade & I. Corp. v. Commercial Metals Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 11, 1953No. 328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 A.2d 700 (1953)

PAN AMERICAN TRADE & INVESTMENT CORP. et al.

v.

COMMERCIAL METALS CO.

No. 328.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

February 11, 1953.

Henry van der Goes, of the firm of Young & Wood, of Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

David F. Anderson, of the firm of Berl, Potter & Anderson, of Wilmington, for defendant.

BRAMHALL, Vice-Chancellor.

The complaint alleges that plaintiffs and defendant agreed that plaintiffs would reveal to defendant where certain steel rail, cast-iron pipe, and steel pipe could be purchased and that if the defendant should be successful in purchasing said materials,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Garber v. WhittakerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  4. Polk v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Stockman v. McKeeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boxer v. Husky Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1981
  2. Cheese Shop International, Inc. v. SteeleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  3. Schneider v. WILMINGTON TRUST CO., BANK OF DEL.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  4. Mario Lopez Garza v. Citigroup IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API