Legal Opinion

Stockman v. McKee

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 28, 1950No. 879 & 959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Judge.

I will dispose of the three motions before me in the order in which they are set forth in the statement of the nature of the case.

Motion to Strike the Lien in Civil Action No. 879

This motion is predicated upon the contention that the plaintiff is a “contractor” within the meaning of Section 3324, Revised Code, 1935 and, as such, is required to file mechanic’s lien proceedings within 30 days after 90 days of the completion of the work,

The term “contractor” as it is used in the Mechanic’s Lien Law has been defined by the courts of this state. In Carswell v. Patzowski, 4 Penn.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Breeding v. MelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
  4. Iannoti v. KalmbacherSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Voigtmann v. Wilmington Trust Building Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gordy v. Preform Building Components, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  3. E. K. Geyser Co. v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. In Re Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Ft. Lauderdale, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  5. Pan American Trade & Investment Corp. v. Commercial Metals Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API