Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Roseburg v. Mohar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1932No. 23636. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteixert, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Kittitas county which declared the defendant, Tony Mohar, guilty of contempt of court for his failure to obey a judgment made and entered in the case of Roseburg et ux. v. Mohar et ux., No. 8074 of that court.

The controversy between the parties in cause No. 8074 involves the use of the waters of a certain spring located on the west half of the west half of the southeast quarter of section 3, township 19 north, range 15 east, W. M. In the complaint in that action, Roseburg and wife based their claim to the use of the waters of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Burrows v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Lindsley v. GradyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. West Side Irrigating Co. v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Five Corners Family Farmers v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re KoomeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. LewWashington Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API