Legal Opinion

Fox v. . Yarborough

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Taking note of tbe fact tbat plaintiffs do not challenge tbe sufficiency of tbe showing made by defendant in support of Iris motions upon wbicb tbe orders in question are based, decision on this appeal is restricted to tbis question: After complaint is filed, and before answer is filed, are tbe provisions of tbe statute, G. S., 1-569, and G. S., 1-570, available to defendant for adverse examination of plaintiffs to procure information to file answer?

Tbe question is answered by tbe statute,, and in interpretative decisions of tbis Court.

Tbe statute provides that a party to an action may be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Vann v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Holt v. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Chesson v. Washington County BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Ward v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flanner v. Saint Joseph Home for the Blind SistersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Nance v. Gilmore Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Culbertson v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Williams v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API