Legal Opinion

Williams v. Blount

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7210SC14Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendants are appealing from an order entered allowing plaintiff to examine defendants for the purpose of securing information to draw a complaint. Appeal from such an order is premature and subject to dismissal. Tillis v. Cotton Mills, 238 N.C. 124, 76 S.E. 2d 376; Brown v. Clement Co., 203 N.C. 508, 166 S.E. 515; Johnson v. Mills Company, 196 N.C. 93, 144 S.E. 534. However, this Court can, and in this case will, in its discretion, consider the appeal on its merits. Fox v. Yarborough, 225 N.C. 606, 35 S.E. 2d 885; Knight v. Little, 217 N.C. 681, 9 S.E. 2d 377; Bohannon v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Knight v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Johnson v. Harriet Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Fox v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API