Culbertson v. Rogers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
The real question for determination on this appeal is whether or not the court committed error in permitting the plaintiff to introduce in evidence the examination of Raymond Rogers, taken for the purpose of enabling the plaintiff to frame her complaint. The admissibility of this evidence must be determined in light of the provisions of G.S. 1-669, 1-670 and 1-571 which were in effect prior to July 1, 1961, and the decisions of this Court construing the same.
The present statutes governing the examination of witnesses before trial were enacted by the General Assembly, Chapter 760, 1951 Session…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Bailey v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Vann v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Snipes v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Holt v. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.