Crosslin v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action for injunction by W. E. Crosslin and others against the Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Company and others, in which the First National Bank of Cleveland was joined as a- defendant. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.
This action was commenced on the 9th day of December, 1914, by the plaintiff in error Wm. E. Crosslin, as plaintiff in the court below, against the defendants in error, except the First National Bank of Cleveland, as defendants therein, to enjoin the collection of a certain special assessment levied pursuant to chapter 10, S. L. 1907-08, p. 166, as amended by article 1, c. 7, S. L. 1909, p. 131, against a lot or parcel of land belonging to him, fronting and abutting on East Main street in the city of Enid, Okla* to pay the cost of the improvement of said street. The other plaintiffs in errer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Marth v. City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Rogers v. Bass & Harbour Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Grier v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baxley v. City of FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bocox v. Town of BixbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Roberts v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, FIREMEN'S RELIEF & PENSION FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Woodward v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.