Legal Opinion

Crow v. Crow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1965No. 37650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

February 13, 1963, Marge F. Crow commenced this action against Howard R. Crow to recover $6,000 which she alleged she advanced to him as a loan. Defendant’s answer admitted that he had received the money, but denied that it was a loan or that there was any obligation to repay.

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Defendant filed the following affidavit in opposition thereto:

Howard R. Crow, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states: The statements contained in plaintiff’s Complaint and in her affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment are not true in respect of her claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ayres v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Edoff v. HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Zackovich v. JasmontWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. DickneiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  5. Kraft v. WodillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern State Construction Co. v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Malacky v. SchepplerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Aust v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API