Kraft v. Wodill

We are satisfied on this appeal that defendant Wodill has not successfully attacked the trial court’s findings of fact with respect to the condition of the. tavern fixtures which he purchased. The facts are clear that Kraft gave Wodill every opportunity to inspect. Wodill and three other adult members of his family visited the tavern in which the fixtures were located about two weeks before his purchase of the tavern business. Wodill failed to inspect the fixtures on that occasion. A casual inspection would have disclosed that they were secondhand and somewhat the worse for wear. Furthermore,…