Legal Opinion

Aust v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 11, 1977No. 2170-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ringold, J.*

In 1957, plaintiff Kuni Aust and her now deceased husband, as sellers, entered into an executory contract for the sale of land to the defendant Edward Bridges, as purchaser. This contract included a 3 1/2-acre parcel known as the Bruceport Park-Legion property, which was also included in the description contained in the fulfillment deed.

*555In 1961, the purchaser had a sale pending to a third party and was prepared to make final payment on the contract. The seller refused to deliver the fulfillment deed, asserting that the Legion property should not have been included in the land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rogich v. DresselWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. United Truck Lines, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Malacky v. SchepplerWashington Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Giambattista v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Giambattista v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API