Legal Opinion

Fidler v. Schiller

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1963No. Civ. 26668PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff Fidler, by a complaint in five counts, sought recovery of monies said to have been wrongfully withheld by defendant Schiller, a real estate broker. Schiller, by cross-complaint, demanded of Fidler and others the balance of commissions assertedly due him. From a judgment adverse to him on both the complaint and the cross-complaint, Schiller has appealed. He has also noticed an appeal from the order denying his motion to vacate the above judgment and enter a different judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 663) ; but since the trial court was simply called upon to repeat or overrule the former…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API