Fidler v. Schiller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff Fidler, by a complaint in five counts, sought recovery of monies said to have been wrongfully withheld by defendant Schiller, a real estate broker. Schiller, by cross-complaint, demanded of Fidler and others the balance of commissions assertedly due him. From a judgment adverse to him on both the complaint and the cross-complaint, Schiller has appealed. He has also noticed an appeal from the order denying his motion to vacate the above judgment and enter a different judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 663) ; but since the trial court was simply called upon to repeat or overrule the former…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967