Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1967No. Civ. 8314PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

have concluded that plaintiff has no cause of action premised upon an agreement to pay her a real estate commission and has failed to sustain the burden of proof of any fraud allegedly practiced upon her by defendant Rosenbaum. Attempted appeal from the order denying motion for new trial is dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963.) Appellant noticed an appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the above judgment and enter conclusions of law eon sistent with the findings of fact (Code Civ. Proe., § 663); but since the motion called upon the trial court to repeat or overrule the former…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jaffe v. Albertson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Franklin v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bland v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Barcelon v. CorteseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Osborne v. Huntington Beach Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bland v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API