Legal Opinion

Nissen v. Miller

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1940No. 4535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Chief Justice.

Appellants, owners and operators of beauty shops, filed an application for a writ of mandamus against the appellees, as members and officers of the State Board of Cosmetologists of New Mexico, commanding said Board to reinstate a certain order of August 27, 1937, which said latter order approved a schedule of minimum prices in said district. An alternative writ was issued, the allegations of which were traversed by appellees. Upon a stipulation of facts reflected in the judgment, a hearing was had at which time the alternative writ was dissolved and it was adjudged that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. EnderleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. Com'rs. of Sinking Fund, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Commissioners of Sinking Fund v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Earl v. Tulsa County District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Arnold v. Board of Barber ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Michael v. Warner/ChilcottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Securities Acceptance Corp. v. ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Michael v. Warner/ChilcottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API