Legal Opinion

Michael v. Warner/Chilcott

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1978No. 3133Published

1Opinion of the Court

579 P.2d 183 (1978)

Kaiser MICHAEL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WARNER/CHILCOTT, a Division of Warner Lambert Company, a Foreign Corporation, Davis Brothers Drug Company, Amfac Drug Supply, Ted Sanderson, a Representative of Warner/Chilcott, Defendants, and

Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Byrne Cates, a Representative of Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

McKesson ROBBINS, A Foreign Corporation, and Foremost-McKession, A Foreign Corporation, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

REVLON, Inc., A Foreign Corporation, successor corporation to Nysco…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API