Earl v. Tulsa County District Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The question sought to be presented is whether by the terms of 19 O.S.Supp.1974 § 138.4(a) 1 discretion is reposed in the district judges in each of the two affected counties 2 to establish the public defender’s salary and that of each of his/her bugetarily authorized assistants at some level “commensurate with” that provided for the counterpart positions in the local prosecutor’s office. Petitioners urge upon us a construction mandating absolute and undeviating equality of compensation rates for comparable functionaries in the two services. We assume jurisdiction under Art. 7…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Galloway v. TruesdellNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Wilson v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Case of Supervisors of ElectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Roberts v. Miss. Rep. Party State Exec. Comm.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.