Legal Opinion

Graham v. Norris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 2000No. 98-1124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TOM GLAZE, Justice.

This appeal represents the last in a trilogy of cases in which inmates contend they were unlawfully denied meritorious good time when the General Assembly enacted what Teddy Graham contends to be ex post facto legislation. Duncan v. State, 337 Ark. 306, 987 S.W.2d 721 (1999); Ellis v. Norris, 333 Ark. 200, 968 S.W.2d 609 (1998). Our court took jurisdiction of this case to interpret certain Arkansas acts and statutes that deal with prisoners’ meritorious good time and to determine if those laws, or the State’s application of them, have violated Arkansas’s or the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Ellis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API