Graham v. Norris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
TOM GLAZE, Justice.
This appeal represents the last in a trilogy of cases in which inmates contend they were unlawfully denied meritorious good time when the General Assembly enacted what Teddy Graham contends to be ex post facto legislation. Duncan v. State, 337 Ark. 306, 987 S.W.2d 721 (1999); Ellis v. Norris, 333 Ark. 200, 968 S.W.2d 609 (1998). Our court took jurisdiction of this case to interpret certain Arkansas acts and statutes that deal with prisoners’ meritorious good time and to determine if those laws, or the State’s application of them, have violated Arkansas’s or the United…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ellis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000