Legal Opinion

Duncan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1999No. CR 97-1060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1988, the appellant, Ross Duncan, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and was sentenced to a term of forty years’ imprisonment. At the time of Duncan’s conviction, inmates in the Department of Correction could earn “good time” credits that could be applied toward the reduction of their sentences. One form of good time credit was awarded automatically by the Department to prisoners who were classified into one of four categories. The other form of good time credit was discretionary meritorious good time, or “extra good, time,” which could be awarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Ellis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Correction v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Graham v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Graham v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006
  5. Trice v. City of Pine BluffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API