Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bujanowski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1992No. 2743PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This case is before a court en banc for reargument of a Commonwealth appeal from an order which granted a defense motion in limine to prevent the Commonwealth from using an extrajudicial statement by an unavailable witness as substantive evidence implicating Ronald Bujanowski, Sr. and Marvin Gorelick, appellees, in a series of burglaries committed in Bensalem Township, Bucks County. 1

Ronald Bujanowski, Jr. was apprehended by Bensalem Township police in connection with three burglaries which had been committed in Bensalem Township during the month of August, 1989. He gave a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. OverbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API