Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1998PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:

Appellant Larry L. Bell appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying his petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9541 et seq. (“PCRA”). We affirm.

Larry Bell and Elwood Small conspired to rob Patrick Blake, a drug dealer from whom Bell had recently purchased marijuana. After arming themselves, Bell with a shotgun and Small with a twelve-inch kitchen knife, the two men went to Blake’s apartment in the 6300 block of Germantown Avenue in Philadelphia and demanded money from him. Bell…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. ValentineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Feldman v. HoffmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API