Cohen v. City of Alameda
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the time prescribed by law.
The appeal was taken within less than sixty days, but more than thirty days, after the entry of judgment. Under sections 939 and 941b of the Code of Civil Procedure, this would be within the time prescribed. The contention of the respondent is that the case is governed by the provisions of section 6 of the act of March 6, 1905, providing for the levy of assessments upon a district to pay for lighting the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re Shafter-Wasco Irr. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Orange County Water District v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Orange County Water Dist. v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.