Legal Opinion

Orange County Water Dist. v. Farnsworth

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1956No. Civ. No. 5239PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

138 Cal.App.2d 518 (1956)

ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, Respondent,

v.

F. E. FARNSWORTH et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 5239.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist.

Jan. 17, 1956.

Blodget & Blodget, L. W. Blodget, Dale H. Heinly, John H. Gilbert, Jr., and Harry M. Irwin for Appellants.

A. W. Rutan, Milford W. Dahl, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Eugene M. Prince, Eugene D. Bennett and Samuel L. Wright for Respondent.

BARNARD, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining the validity of a replenishment assessment levied by the Orange County Water District in accordance with the Orange County Water…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Spencer v. G. A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re DapperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API