Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Orange County Water District v. Farnsworth

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1956No. Civ. 5239PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining the validity of a replenishment assessment levied by the Orange County Water District in accordance with the Orange County Water District Act (Stats. 1933, ch. 924), as amended by chapter 770 of the Statutes of 1953. The original act provided for seven directors of the district and provided three methods of raising funds, (1) a general assessment on an ad valorem basis, (2) a special assessment if authorized by a special election, and (3) the issuance of bonds. The 1953 amendment brought into the district the cities of Santa Ana, Anaheim and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Spencer v. G. A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re DapperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API