Scatena v. Pittsburgh & New England Trucking
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
This is the consolidation of two cross actions in tort, growing out of a collision between two trucks. At the conclusion of all the evidence Pittsburgh & New England Trucking (P. & N.E.), the defendant in one case and the plaintiff in the other, filed motions for directed verdicts. The motions were denied, and exceptions were taken. The jury returned verdicts favorable to Scatena in both cases. The issues presented to us are, first, was there sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of P. & N.E. to allow the case against it to go to the jury and, second, was negligence on the part of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Montgomery v. National Convoy & Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Joyce v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Pender v. National Convoy & Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lynne Stockberger, Both Personally and as the Representative of Maurice Stockberger, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Mlynarchik v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Tanner v. Eliot Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- L. G. Balfour Co. v. Ablondi & Boynton Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Stockberger, Lynne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003