Tanner v. Eliot Realty Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.
The question presented for review in this action of tort for negligence is whether the trial judge erred in allowing the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence (Mass.R.Civ.P. 50[a], 365 Mass. 814 [1974]), pursuant to which judgment was entered on the verdict (Mass.R.Civ.P. 58[a], 365 Mass. 826 [1974]). The motion was based upon the plaintiff’s voluntary assumption of the risk and contributory negligence. The plaintiff seeks damages for personal injury resulting from a fall on the defendant’s premises.1
We summarize the evidence most favorable to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Silver v. CushnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Frost v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Breault v. Ford Motor CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Baldassari v. Produce Terminal Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rivkin v. Monsanto Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Bonomo v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979