Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Eliot Realty Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 29, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.

The question presented for review in this action of tort for negligence is whether the trial judge erred in allowing the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence (Mass.R.Civ.P. 50[a], 365 Mass. 814 [1974]), pursuant to which judgment was entered on the verdict (Mass.R.Civ.P. 58[a], 365 Mass. 826 [1974]). The motion was based upon the plaintiff’s voluntary assumption of the risk and contributory negligence. The plaintiff seeks damages for personal injury resulting from a fall on the defendant’s premises.1

We summarize the evidence most favorable to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Silver v. CushnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Frost v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Breault v. Ford Motor CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Baldassari v. Produce Terminal Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivkin v. Monsanto Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Bonomo v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API