Legal Opinion

Mlynarchik v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 31, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The plaintiff brought an action in tort seeking to recover for her personal injuries claimed to be caused by the defendant’s negligence. The defendant answered by way of general denial. At the close of the evidence the defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict. The motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s bill of exceptions brings before us the question whether there was error in the denial of its motion for a directed verdict.

In reviewing the denial of a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, we consider only…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Gelinas v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Spain v. OikemusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Sherwood v. RadovskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Buckman v. McCarthy Freight System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Essex County Sheriff's DepartmentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Cormier v. GrantMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API