Legal Opinion

Difrancesco v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The plaintiff brought this action in two counts. In the first count he alleged that the defendant received on behalf of the plaintiff $13,500 and was wrongfully withholding therefrom the sum of $3200. The second count was for services and mate" rials claimed to have been furnished by the plaintiff for the defendant. No questions relating to the second count are involved upon this appeal and we do not further refer to it. In his answer, the defendant admitted the receipt of $13,500 and, by way of a special defense, alleged that this sum was received in settlement of a suit brought by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  2. Grievance Committee v. EnnisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Taft v. Valley Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. McKnight v. GizzeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Marcus v. DuPerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Bigelow v. Estate of Edward LathropConnecticut Superior Court · 1945
  5. Citizens Savings Bank v. Rohlman, No. Cv00-0434257 (Jul. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API