Legal Opinion
Taft v. Valley Oil Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 14, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff brought suit for legal services and recovered a judgment. The plaintiff appeals on the ground that the court applied the wrong rule as to measure of damage. The defendant’s appeal attacks the finding, the conclusion and claims error in the rulings on evidence. The exceptions to the finding concern for the most part disputed or immaterial questions and matters going to the merits of the defendant’s claim, which are adequately presented in the finding as made. Such changes as the defendant is entitled to are included in the following statement.
All of the stock of the defendant,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Goodrich v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Piantedosi v. FloridiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.