McCrady-rodgers Co. v. Nenoff
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
This appeal is from the order of the' court below quashing a writ of sciré facias sur mechanics lien and striking the lien from the record. .. ■
The salient facts, which were agreed upon, may be summarized as follows. On March 18, 1941, Helen O. Nenoff, owner ¡of a property on Ludwig Street, Pittsburgh, and Charles Papale, contractor, executed a contract for the erection of a dwelling which provided against the filing of mechanics’ liens by subcontractors. McCrady-Bodgers .Company, appellant herein,' under and in pursuance to verbal. requests of Papale* the principal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appeal of HoferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Singerly v. DoerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Bennar v. Central Mausoleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Felheim v. Perry Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- T. Dan Kolker, Inc. v. ShureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Deets v. FreedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Rome Electric Co. v. R. & F. Construction, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County1974