Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Trainor

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 11, 1976No. 75 C 2603PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLEN, District Judge. 1

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS

This is an action for declaratory and prospective injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought by seven mothers under the age of twenty-one and their children, alleging that the Illinois Department of Public Aid (“IDPA”), through its director, the defendant James L. Trainor, has denied them eligibility, or limited the amount of funds they may receive, under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. It is claimed that these policies violate both the Fourteenth Amendment and certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  2. Metcalf v. TrainorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  3. Allen v. HettlemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. Nafziger v. BlumDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  5. Melton v. New Mexico Department of Human ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API