Nafziger v. Blum
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
These consolidated cases present the second chapter in the saga of New York State’s efforts to superimpose its family responsibility laws on the federal criteria governing eligibility for benefits under the Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) program set forth in Title IV of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq.1 At issue here is an informal, unwrit*707ten policy adopted by the New York State Department of Social Services which denies AFDC benefits to otherwise eligible minor mothers, and to other caretaker relatives under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lori Nafziger, Individually, on Behalf of Her Dependent Son and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Barbara Blum, Individually and in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services and S. Jean Wagoner, Individually and in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Angela Curry, on Behalf of Herself and Her Minor Dependent Child and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Barbara Blum, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services and Michael Nassar, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner, Oneida County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Nafziger v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982