Legal Opinion

Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1976No. 75-1414PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.

Richard and Barbara Hysell, husband and wife, instituted this diversity action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries from the Iowa Public Service Company (IPS) and the City of Sioux City, Iowa.1 IPS and Sioux City joined the Irving F. Jensen Company and Thurman Simpson, an employee of Jensen Company, as third-party defendants for indemnity or contribution. Sioux City also filed a cross-claim against IPS seeking contractual indemnification.

The principal facts are undisputed:

Richard Hysell was employed by Jensen Company as a grading and paving laborer on the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Solomon Dehydrating Company, Incorporated v. Clarence R. Guyton, Central Greyhound Lines, Incorporated, and the Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ina M. Overton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Clarke v. BurkleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Occhino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Charles R. Howard v. Katherine GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API