Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Case Certified from Circuit Court, Kanawba County. Action by W. 0. Taylor against tbe Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Demurrer to declaration sustained, and questions presented, with circuit court’s rulings thereon, certified for review.

1Opinion of the Court

MlLLER, PRESIDENT:

The sufficiency of plaintiff’s declaration was challenged by defendant’s demurrer. The court below sustained the demurrer, and has certified the questions presented with its rulings thereon to us for review.

The substantial averments are that the plaintiff was owner of certain real estate and personal property in the town of Eskdale, situated upon and near the banks of Cabin Creek, a non-navigable stream, and about one hundred yards above the trestles or bridges of the defendant company crossing said creek; that on or about August 9, 1916, there was a cloud burst on the head…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Cubbins v. Mississippi River CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Keller v. City of Corpus ChristiTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Surocco v. GearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Neal v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. McCausland v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Trump v. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Halltown Paperboard Co. v. C. L. Robinson Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Clements v. Phœnix Utility Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API