Legal Opinion

Neal v. Ohio River R.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1899PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wood County. Action by Paul and Sarah M. Neal against the Ohio River Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNnon, Judge:

This is an action by Neal and wife against the Ohio River Railroad Company, in Wood County circuit court, resulting in a judgment for plaintiffs for two hundred and fifty dollars upon demurrer by defendant to the evidence.

I. It is claimed that there is a variance between the title as pleaded in the declaration and that shown in evidence. The declaration alleges the plaintiffs as seised and possessed of a tract of land, whereas a life estate is shown. That allegation is sufficient to admit evidence against a wrongdoer for tort for damage to any estate, — years, life, or fee.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayer v. FrobeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Yeager v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Henry v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Clay v. City of St. AlbansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Town of Paden City v. FeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. McCausland v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Morris Associates, Inc. v. PriddyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rait v. FurrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API